There are, however, many people who have no obvioussign of disease what so ever, but when their blood serum is tested they show positive evidence of having been exposed to the virus. This is on the basis of the fact that antibodies to the AIDS virus are found in their blood. Such “asymptomatic but seropositive” people may or may not carry enough virus to be infectious. Mostly sadly, through, current research and experience with the disease would seem to indicate that eventually nearly all people who are seropositive will develop the full blown AIDS disease. There is one ray of hope here: It may some cases take up to 15 years or more between one’s becoming seropositive for the AIDS virus and one’s developing the disease. Thus, all those millions( soon to be tens and hundreds of millions) who are now seropositive for AIDS are under a sentence of death, but a sentence that may not be carried out for one or two decades in a significant fraction of cases. Medical research holds the possibility of commuting that sentence, or reserving it.
There is one other fact that needs to be mentioned here because it is highly significant in determining recommendations for safe sexual conduct which will be discussed below: Currently, it is felt that after exposure to the virus, most people will turn seropositive for it (develop a positive blood test for it) within four months. There are few people whose blood shows no antibodies to the virus, but from whom live virus has been cultured. Thus, if one is seronegative, it is not exposed to the virus. This category of people is very hard to test for, and currently felt to be quite rare. Some even speculate that such people may be rare examples of those who are immune to the effects of the virus, but this remains speculation. It is not known if such people can also transmit the virus.
The AIDS virus is extremely fragile, and is killed by exposure to mild detergents or to chlorox, among other things. AIDS itself may be transmitted by actual virus particles, or by the transmission of living human cells that contain AIDS viral DNA already grafted onto the human DNA. Or both. Which of these two mechanisms is the main one is not known until now? But the fact remains that it is VERY hard to catch AIDS unless one engages in certain specific activities.
Casual contact (shaking hands, hugging, sharing tools) cannot transmit AIDS. Although live virus has been recovered from saliva of AIDS patients, the techniques used to do this involved concentrating the virus to extents many thousands of times greater than occur in normal human contact, such as kissing. There is no evidence that sharing food or eating utensils with an AIDS patient can transmit the virus. The same is true for transmission by sneezing or coughing. There just is no current that the disease can be transmitted that way. The same may be true even for biting, through here there may be some increased (though still remote) chance of transmitting the disease.
AIDS is transmitted particularly by the transmission of blood or semen or an infected person into contact with the blood of an uninfected person. As mentioned above, AIDS is also transmitted among intravenous drug user by the sharing of needles. Testing of donated blood for AIDS has massivly reduced the chance of catching AIDS from blood transfusions. But a very small risk still remains. To further reduce that risk, efforts have been made to use “autotransfusions” on cases of “elective surgery” (surgery that can be planned months in advance). Autotransfusion involves the patient storing their own blood a couple of weeks prior to their own surgery; to be used during the surgery if needed. Similarly, setting up donations of blood from friends and family known to be antibody negative and at low risk for AIDS prior to scheduled surgery further can decrease the already small risks from transfusion.
The “sexual revolution” of the 1960’s in the developed world has been slowed down in its tracks by the AIDS epidemic. The danger of contracting AIDS is so real now that it has massively affected the behavior of both gay and straight people who formerly had elected to lead an effective sexual life that included numerous new sexual contacts.
There currently is no treatment for AIDS (this includes AZT) that show significant promise.
It is my own strongly held view, and that of the medical and research community world wide, that the AIDS epidemic is serious problem, with the potential to become the worst plague this species has ever known. This is serous business. Vastly greater sums should be spent on searching for treatments and vaccines. On the other hand, we feel strongly that this not “merely” a disease; it is the warning from the God to misguided people. And while it does not seem likely we will find either a cure or a vaccine in the forseeable future it may be that truly effective treatments that can indefinitely prolong the life of AIDS victims